根據(jù)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》規(guī)定,賬號(hào)需要綁定手機(jī)號(hào)才可以使
用評(píng)論、發(fā)帖、打賞。
請(qǐng)及時(shí)綁定,以保證產(chǎn)品功能順暢使用。
丑陋的交易?評(píng)基特爾轉(zhuǎn)會(huì)快步
轉(zhuǎn)會(huì)市場(chǎng)目前為止最重磅的兩宗交易莫過于快步車隊(duì)的“一進(jìn)一出”:簽入基特爾,送走卡文迪什(詳見《基特爾轉(zhuǎn)投快步 接班卡文迪什》《卡文迪什投奔南非勁旅MTN-庫(kù)貝卡》)。外界普遍認(rèn)為這是兩代沖刺巨星之間的新老交替。主角之一的基特爾日前在個(gè)人網(wǎng)站發(fā)表博客,談到了一些自己的想法。
首先,基特爾認(rèn)為這個(gè)賽季是一個(gè)“糟糕的賽季”。賽季初受流感病毒襲擊,之后病情一直反復(fù),讓他一直找不回去年那種所向披靡的感覺。持續(xù)低迷的表現(xiàn),直接令他錯(cuò)過了年度最重要的賽事——環(huán)法。基特爾坦言:“這對(duì)我來(lái)說是一個(gè)沉重的打擊!蓖瑫r(shí)他也很清楚,“挫折和失敗是人生的必經(jīng)之路,你要從中學(xué)到一些東西!
大家更關(guān)心的則是,基特爾與捷安特-阿佩辛車隊(duì)提前解約,執(zhí)意離開的原因;貭栭_誠(chéng)布公的提到了車隊(duì)的新形勢(shì):“我不在的時(shí)候,車隊(duì)發(fā)生了變化。有的年輕人在總成績(jī)方面表現(xiàn)很好,車隊(duì)因此會(huì)往這個(gè)方面發(fā)展。我很認(rèn)真的思考過,也和車隊(duì)管理層交流過,最終結(jié)論是,車隊(duì)未來(lái)留個(gè)我這樣的純沖刺手的空間不多。所以我想,我是時(shí)候離開了!
然而,國(guó)外網(wǎng)友“SpaceKnight”的看法和基特爾本人截然不同。他認(rèn)為這些都是基特爾為了維護(hù)自己的公眾形象而作的說辭。他羅列了以下幾個(gè)論點(diǎn):
一,車隊(duì)今年不讓基特爾去環(huán)法,并非出于功利主義;恰恰相反,他們頂住了來(lái)自贊助商的壓力,保護(hù)了狀態(tài)不佳的基特爾,因?yàn)閺?qiáng)行參加高強(qiáng)度的環(huán)法,對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)的基特爾來(lái)說是一種傷害;
二,車隊(duì)其他成員并無(wú)變化,沖刺火車還在,車隊(duì)暫時(shí)并未有任何“轉(zhuǎn)型”的舉動(dòng);
三,迪穆蘭明年的第一目標(biāo)是里約熱內(nèi)盧奧運(yùn)的個(gè)人計(jì)時(shí)賽,并不是環(huán)法;
四,快步的沖刺火車還不如捷安特,而且他們沒有能帶沖的人?ㄎ牡鲜簿褪且?yàn)檫@個(gè)少了一大堆勝場(chǎng),何況對(duì)沖刺火車更依賴的基特爾;
五,快步車隊(duì)幾乎各種各樣的比賽都有目標(biāo),而且他們從來(lái)沒有一個(gè)明確的戰(zhàn)術(shù)核心;基特爾卻習(xí)慣了整支車隊(duì)圍著他一個(gè)人轉(zhuǎn)。
結(jié)論:
一,基特爾去快步并不會(huì)過得比現(xiàn)在好,起碼明年不會(huì);
二,他應(yīng)該呆到合同結(jié)束再選擇去留,畢竟現(xiàn)在這支車隊(duì)是圍繞著他(和德根科爾布)建立的,他需要對(duì)這支車隊(duì)負(fù)責(zé);這個(gè)時(shí)候一走了之,有點(diǎn)忘恩負(fù)義;
三,今年新的贊助商阿佩辛一定有種“被耍了”的感覺,他們以后可能不會(huì)再來(lái)了;
四,勒夫勒(快步車隊(duì)經(jīng)理)做了一筆對(duì)他們自己不錯(cuò)的生意:挖到了一些比利時(shí)樂透(擁有另一個(gè)沖刺巨星格萊佩爾)原來(lái)的贊助商,還打亂了阿佩辛的算盤。然而這會(huì)讓更多的贊助商對(duì)自行車運(yùn)動(dòng)望而卻步。都怪勒夫勒這個(gè)狡猾的投機(jī)商人。
快步當(dāng)家勒夫勒一直給人老謀深算的形象
綜述:
這是車壇近年來(lái)最丑陋的一宗交易。
對(duì)于這個(gè)交易,你怎么看?歡迎登陸美騎賬號(hào),在文章下方評(píng)論區(qū)暢所欲言。10月份美騎評(píng)論有獎(jiǎng)活動(dòng)繼續(xù),獎(jiǎng)品又升級(jí),詳情請(qǐng)點(diǎn)http://www.1gmeiykl.com/industry/business/24601.html
文章最后附上評(píng)論原文:
The ugliest transfer in cycling in recent history and the arguments don`t add up, at least for next year.
This year: Kittel was duped for the tour with proven lack of form, my interpretation was that the team protected the rider against himself, choosing that over sponsorship wishes to have Kittel at the tour.
Next year:
The team has virtually no change in the roster, his leadout train is still there. a bunch of non climbing hard hitters.
Dumoulin will focus on the Olympic time trial, no full GC team in the tour.
The Etixx team will have no dedicated lead out. Cavendish had the same problems: this team is build for riding echelons and racing, not for calculated clinical lead outs. (and Cavendish was a lot more capable to deal with that then Kittel)
The Etixx team has Multiple goals in almost every race, hardly ever a dedicated one trick pony team.
Overall:
No improvement for next year, maybe after that but he could just as well have fullfilled his contract and move the next year.
The Giant-Alpecin team was build around Kittel (and Degenkolb) Alpacin might feel unjustly treated and leave after their contract is done, Kittel caries the responsibility for the team and now just walks away from it.
Lefevre gains a sponsor by nipping them away from Lotto Soudal and devaluating the sponsorship of Alpecin. Good for Etixx, but undermining the value and trustworthiness to sponsors of cycling as a whole. Lefevre is once again a weaselling opportunist.
Conclusion: the ugliest transfer in cycling for a long time.
責(zé)任編輯:knightof1
根據(jù)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》規(guī)定,賬號(hào)需要綁定手機(jī)號(hào)才可以使
用評(píng)論、發(fā)帖、打賞。
請(qǐng)及時(shí)綁定,以保證產(chǎn)品功能順暢使用。